<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" version="2.0"><channel><title><![CDATA[Unique display of missing version information]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto">At the moment there are multiple ways how missing version information are shown:</p>
<ul>
<li>Text <strong>–</strong></li>
<li>Text <strong>?</strong></li>
<li>Text <strong>Unknown</strong></li>
</ul>
<p dir="auto">There should be one <strong>unique</strong> way how missing version information should be displayed.</p>
]]></description><link>https://vulndetect.org/topic/125/unique-display-of-missing-version-information</link><generator>RSS for Node</generator><lastBuildDate>Fri, 15 May 2026 10:44:19 GMT</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://vulndetect.org/topic/125.rss" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/><pubDate>Tue, 29 May 2018 13:25:51 GMT</pubDate><ttl>60</ttl><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to Unique display of missing version information on Sat, 09 May 2020 10:38:34 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<h3>This feature is not fully implemented</h3>
<p dir="auto">Today I saw that you still have <strong>two different texts</strong> for missing version information (both in the same product):</p>
<ul>
<li>Unknown, please report</li>
<li>Please report version</li>
</ul>
<p dir="auto"><img src="/assets/uploads/files/1589019986043-b4aa143f-cb96-4347-9a4c-9efafff53556-image.png" alt="b4aa143f-cb96-4347-9a4c-9efafff53556-image.png" class=" img-fluid img-markdown" /></p>
<p dir="auto"><strong><a class="plugin-mentions-user plugin-mentions-a" href="/user/tom" aria-label="Profile: Tom">@<bdi>Tom</bdi></a></strong> I merged both topics (we had one in "Bugs" and removed the "Implemented" from the title.</p>
]]></description><link>https://vulndetect.org/post/3330</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://vulndetect.org/post/3330</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[OLLI_S]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 09 May 2020 10:38:34 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to Unique display of missing version information on Tue, 24 Sep 2019 06:26:47 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto">I agree, and it has been changed. Just ping me if there is inconsistencies for other products</p>
]]></description><link>https://vulndetect.org/post/3167</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://vulndetect.org/post/3167</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[Tom]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 24 Sep 2019 06:26:47 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to Unique display of missing version information on Thu, 01 Aug 2019 21:05:09 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto">I have two applications where VulnDetect asks me to report the correct version number:</p>
<ul>
<li><strong>Arc Client</strong> (here the version number is <strong>Please report version</strong>)</li>
<li><strong>Xinorbis</strong> (here the version number is <strong>Unknown, please report</strong>)</li>
</ul>
<p dir="auto">In my opinion these two texts should be unique.<br />
You should <strong>show for both files</strong>  the version number <strong>Unknown, please report</strong>.</p>
]]></description><link>https://vulndetect.org/post/3137</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://vulndetect.org/post/3137</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[OLLI_S]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 01 Aug 2019 21:05:09 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to Unique display of missing version information on Tue, 06 Nov 2018 17:21:45 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto">I recognized you display a "?" for missing version information, so this feature seems to be implemented.</p>
]]></description><link>https://vulndetect.org/post/1726</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://vulndetect.org/post/1726</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[OLLI_S]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 06 Nov 2018 17:21:45 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to Unique display of missing version information on Tue, 02 Oct 2018 12:15:27 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto">I believe we are consistent int VulnDetect with this now (from a coding perspective).</p>
<p dir="auto">There may be a few Rules left with wrong version information, but these are fixed as we see them or it is reported here on the forum.</p>
<p dir="auto">I believe we should close this.</p>
]]></description><link>https://vulndetect.org/post/1611</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://vulndetect.org/post/1611</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[VulnDetect]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 02 Oct 2018 12:15:27 GMT</pubDate></item></channel></rss>